Commission Injunction:
- on desecration of Historical Monuments along
M3.
Last June, the Commission sent a final warning to Ireland
indicating that it had failed to adopt proper legislation
to account for the Environmental Impact Assessment
Directive (85/337/EEC) and was pursuing legal action. The
case suggests that (1) Ireland's approach to decisions
involving the removal of historic structures and
archaeological monuments is in contravention of the
directive and (2) that the weaknesses in Irish
legislation splits decision-making between Irish planning
authorities and Ireland's Environmental Protection Agency
and result in outcomes not permitted by the directive.
The Commission particularly cites the case of Lismullin,
Co Meath in this warning.
In late July, European Parliaments Petitions committee
called for a halt on construction of the M3 motorway,
pending a decision on the legality of the project. It was
felt that at the very least, demolition of Tara should
cease until a decision is reached.
Currently in Ireland, demolition of historic and
archaeological sites at Tara continues at a rapid pace
and blatant disregard for European Community law and
Commission warnings only intensifies. This destruction
can even take place after dark in order to avoid
investigation and further attention. This is not in
accordance with EU law and is also illegal according to
the excavation contracts of those involved.
We wish to know,
(1) If the Commission can legally demand a temporary
halt? If it is willing to do so? If so, when is the
earliest it will impose such a halt?
(2) If the Commission can not or will not impose a halt,
what does the Commission hope to achieve through a court
case, if the monuments will be long since destroyed by
the time a judgement is passed?
Kathy Sinnott, MEP. 9th. November 2007.
P-5712/07EN
Answer given by Mr. Dimas on behalf of the Commission
(14.1.2008)
The Commission cannot itself order a halt to works of the
kind referred to by the Honourable Member. Under Article
243 of the EC Treaty, the Court of Justice may prescribe
any necessary interim measures in relation to proceedings
before it and the Commission may request the Court to
prescribe such measures. There is limited case-law on the
circumstances in which interim measures are likely to be
granted. The Honourable Member is referred to the orders
of the Court in Case C-320/03, Commission v Austria for
an insight into the factors that the Court is likely to
take into account.
In October 2007, the Commission announced an intention of
referring Ireland to the Court in the case mentioned by
the Honourable Member (see Commission press release
IP/07/1524 of 17th. October 2007). The Commission did not
decide to seek interim measures. As the press release
indicates, the case in question relates to the
correctness of the national legislation used to give
effect to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27th. June 1985
on the assessment of the effects of certain public and
private projects on the environment as well as to the
correct interpretation to be placed on the Directive in
respect of decisions involving the removal of historic
structures and monuments. The Commission hopes to achieve
an outcome that will result in the correct national
legislation being put in place and the correct
interpretation of the Directive applied. On a more
general note, the Commission can only encourage national,
regional and local authorities of Member States to take
all the necessary measures to protect and promote their
cultural and archaeological heritage.
Follow-up Question from Kathy Sinnott, MEP.
(17.1.2008)
In reference to the answer from Mr. Dimas, on behalf of
the Commission, on the 14th. January 2008 (P-5712/07EN)
what has the Commission done to encourage the Irish
Government, Meath County Council, or the National Roads
Authority to protect and promote their cultural and
archaeological heritage?
Related Articles:
Commission
to bring EIA case to the European Court of
Justice.
EU
Petitions Committee pleads for Tara.
Letter to John Gormley from Marcin Libicki, Chairman, EU
Petitions Committee.
John
Gormley can and must reverse the decision on M3 and
Tara.
Commission
Sends Warning on Tara: All Work at Tara Must Stop!