THE STRANGER COMES TO TARA
by - Dáithí Ó hÓgáin

The ancient feis Temro (’Feast of Tara’), seems to have been held only once in the reign of a king, and its purpose was to sacralise and proclaim his right to the kingship. The residue of this early Tara cult had a huge effect on Irish tradition. All the literary sources, in their backward look onto the prehistoric era, portray it as a sacred and consequently a royal centre. It was there and in its vicinity of the Boyne valley that they locate the most crucial decisions governing the culture, as well as many of the most important mythical events.

I would suggest that a basic element in the ritual of kingship at Tara was that the father-deity, called usually an Daghdha, represented the sun, and that the conceit was for that solar figure to bestow the kingship for a while on the reigning monarch. The actual wealth of the kingship was symbolised as a woman who proffered ale to the king. From this format comes much of the ritual material and of the nomenclature which storytellers and writers developed into the Irish narrative lore which has come down to us from the Middle Ages. This mediaeval process was the development of ritual into romance. What I am concerned with here is one aspect of this complex in Irish narrative tradition - the result of some long-lost rhetoric's used in the inauguration of Tara kings. To judge by the débris in story - the picture of a brilliant stranger ushering in a new era - such rhetoric's must have been devised by minds not only capable of much imagination but also of no small amount of flattery.

The primordial battle:

Writing of the Gaul's, Julius Caesar stated that they most worshipped a god whom he equated with the Roman Mercurius. ‘They declare him the inventor of all arts, the guide for every road and journey, and they deem him to have the greatest influence for all money-making and commerce’. All the evidence points to Lugh (in Celtic, Lugus) as the deity in question. Sanctuaries with dedications to this personage have been discovered throughout Gaulish territories, and the Celtic placename Lugudunon (’fortress of Lugus’) survives in many forms, for example Lyon, Laon, Lauzun, Laudun, Loudon, and Leiden. His cult appears to have been introduced into Ireland, directly from Gaul or via Britain, and it soon replaced earlier harvest lore and became the nexus of one of the four cardinal points of the Irish year. A glossary compiled in the 9th century, which embodies much ancient lore, explains Lughnasadh as ‘an assembly held by him (i.e. Lugh) at the beginning of harvest each year’, and another early source identifies this assembly as the great fair of Tailtiu (Teltown in Co Meath). The origins of various communal activities relating to festive celebrations were also attributed to him - such as ball-games, horse-racing, and the Irish form of chess.

Irish tradition at all stages represents Lugh as slaying his maternal grandfather, who was a tyrant. This must derive, together with the harvest lore, from the cult of Lugus among the Continental Celts, as it conforms to a myth-pattern which was prevalent among the ancient peoples of the Mediterranean. Since the Greeks knew the plot, it is feasible to assume that the Celts of southern Gaul borrowed it from the long-established Greek colony at Marseilles and applied it to their own harvest-god Lugus, who - under the designation Esus - was reputed to engage in great atmospheric contests with the thunder-god Taranos.

The fullest description of Lugh is found in an 11th-century Irish text Cath Maige Tuired (’the Battle of Moytirra’). The text incorporates material written down several centuries earlier, and it describes the events surrounding what became known as the second battle of Moytirra. It tells of the relations between the Tuatha Dé Danann, and the Fomhóire. In an attempt to establish peace between these two groups, one of the Fomhóire leaders called Balar gave his daughter Eithne to a young man of the Tuatha Dé called Cian, ‘and she bore him the child of accomplishment, that is, Lugh’. Time passed by, and when the Tuatha Dé were oppressed by the Fomhóire they rebelled. The Fomhóire then gathered a massive force in the northern zones of the world and, under the leadership of Balar, prepared to invade Ireland.

The Tuatha Dé were at Tara, planning the defence, when their doorkeeper saw a handsome young warrior approaching. The newcomer announced himself as Lugh, and was told by the doorkeeper that he could not enter the citadel without having an art. Lugh said that he was a builder, but the doorkeeper replied that they already had a builder and did not require another. Lugh said that he was a smith, but got a similar reply. Likewise when he said that he was a champion, harper, warrior, poet, historian, magician, physician, cupbearer, and brazier. Then Lugh said: ‘Ask the king if he has one man who is skilled in all these arts, and if he has I will not enter Tara.’ The doorkeeper told the king that a stranger had arrived who was ‘the man of every single art’, and Nuadhu commanded that he be allowed to enter, ‘because a man like that has never yet come into this fortress’. When he entered, Lugh performed a prodigious feat by throwing a great flagstone over the wall of the building, and then he played magical music on the harp.

It is likely that earlier Celtic tradition portrayed this deity as being particularly suited to a leader’s role, for in Irish he is known as Lugh Lámhfhada - the epithet meaning ‘long-armed’, a suitable image for a good protecting king. The mediaeval literature, in its own fanciful way, echoes something of this by describing how Conn, a mythical king of Tara, once had a vision while in the company of his druids and poets. In the vision he found himself in a wonderful house in the company of a very handsome man and a beautiful woman. The stranger explained that he was Lugh and that the woman was Sovereignty. She gave a drink to Conn, to indicate that he was the king, and Lugh foretold a long list of kings who would succeed him.

The kingship of Tara:

Tara was a sacred centre from time immemorial, and it was situated in the richest part of Ireland. Accordingly, great prestige attached to the gaining of the kingship there. In reality, the ancient kings would have come to power through a combination of factors - such as wealth, diplomacy, and fighting - but no doubt they felt the necessity to legitamise their position. In this way, a compromise had to be reached between personal ambition and social convention. On the conventional side of the equation, the rituals of installation were of great importance, enacting as they did the right of the king to his throne and the right of his people to benefit from him. To guarantee all of this, the involvement of otherworld forces - even if contrived - was necessary, and what the mediaeval literature tells of ritual echoes this. For example:

This is how they did the bull-feast : a white bull was killed and one man consumed his fill of its meat and of its soup, and he slept after that meal, and a charm of truth was sung by four druids over him, and it would be revealed to him then in a vision the identity of the man to be made king, as to his form and his appearance and the nature of the actions he would do.

We note here the parallel between the white bull and the bulls of the same colour sacrificed by the ancient Gaulish druids and with the early lore of white cattle in Ireland. Such animals and their colour reflected both prosperity and benign otherworld forces. The king, having been selected at the direction of spiritual forces, was no longer an ordinary man and must exercise the wisdom and caution appropriate to his office. His reign itself was something of a ritual, and his behaviour and actions were invested with supernatural import. One text describes sacred prohibitions which were on the king of Tara:

The sun must not rise upon him in his bed in the plain of Tara. He must not traverse the plain of Cuilleann after sunset. He must not launch his ship on the next Monday after Bealtaine (May-feast). He must not leave the track of his army on the plain of Maighean on the Tuesday after Samhain (November-feast).

Some of the details here may be mediaeval fancy, but it is significant that emphasis is on the sun and also on the ancient two-part division of the year. The strong suggestion is that the reign of a king was brought into a causal relationship with the sun and the year-cycle, thus reflecting a religious myth which concerned agricultural welfare. Another text stresses that rituals of kingship symbolised natural productivity. This is a literal translation:

There was a king’s chariot at Tara. Two steeds of one colour, who were never before harnessed, were yoked to the chariot. He to whom the sovereignty of Tara was not due, the chariot would tilt up before him so that he could not control it, and the steeds would rear up at him. And there was a king’s mantle in the chariot - he to whom the sovereignty was not due, the mantle was too big for him. And there were two flag-stones in Tara - Blocc and Bluigne. He whom they accepted, they would open before him so that the chariot would go between them. And Fál was there, the stone penis, at the head of the course - he to whom the sovereignty of Tara was due, the Fál used to call against the axle of the chariot so that all heard it.

The imagery here is redolent of sexual intercourse, and it may be viewed as a reflection of the primordial mating of sun and soil. This would mean that the kingship was synonymous with the life-giving forces, and the importance attributed to the Lia Fáil as a wondrous gift of the Tuatha Dé can therefore be explained as a rationalisation of ancient ritual. This explanation dovetails with the general tendency by which early ritual practices of ancient times are reflected as epical motifs in the literary period.

The Érainn at Tara:

The story in which the sacred rituals of Tara are described was committed to writing in the 8th century AD, and is principally concerned with the accession to that kingship of a hero called Conaire, of the ancient Érainn people. His name probably signified ‘warrior-lord’. There are interesting hints of a social dimension to the legend of Conaire - we read of how he gained the throne through the aid of druids and satirists and hornblowers, and through the aid of an army which came from a tumulus. Thus the role of priestly caste and of ceremony, as well as of the otherworld community, is expressed as crucial to the kingship. The ritual practices associated with the reign of a king are clarified by a version of the story which uses the whole life-span of Conaire to symbolise his sacred office.

According to this, the princess Mes Buachalla was abandoned as a child and was raised by a herdsman. When she grew up, she was betrothed to the Tara king Eterscéle. On the night before her wedding, a stranger came to her in the form of a bird and, laying aside his feathers, made love to her. He told her that she would have a son and that this son should not kill birds. After she was married to the king, she gave birth to the child Conaire, and he was taken to be the son of Eterscéle. He was put into fosterage away from home, along with three sons of a champion called Donn Désa. The boy Conaire possessed three great skills - he had great hearing, seeing, and wisdom in giving judgements. In time, king Eterscéle died and his followers assembled for the ‘bull-feast’ to select a new king. The man performing the ritual saw in a vision ‘a stark-naked man, as night ended, on the road to Tara with his stone in his sling’.

Meanwhile, Conaire had been travelling towards Áth Cliath (Dublin) in his chariot, when he saw huge white-speckled birds. He followed them as far as the sea, with the intention of shooting at them from his sling, and they suddenly turned and faced him with spears and swords. One of them protected him, telling him that it was his father, and reminding him that he was forbidden to cast at birds. The bird further instructed him to go to Tara. He did so, naked and at daybreak, and was met by men who put a garment on him and brought him to the citadel to be installed as king. Then Conaire revealed the prohibitions which the bird-man had put on him, as follows:

You must not go right-handwise around Tara or left-handwise around Breagha; you must not hunt the wild animals of Cernae; you must not venture each ninth night out of Tara; and you must not stay in a house from which firelight can be seen to emerge after sunset or can be seen from outside; and three reds must not precede you to the house of Derg; and no plunder must be taken in your reign; and a company of one woman or one man must not come to you in your house after sunset; and you must not intervene in a quarrel between two of your servants.

During the reign of Conaire there was an abundance of wealth and peace, and the weather was wonderfully calm. Eventually, however, he broke all of the sacred prohibitions which had been placed on him and he was slain in a scene reminiscent of Greek tragedy.

This lore seems to preserve several elements of ancient belief in Ireland, though these elements are couched in narrative form. The role of the birds in the story might be interpreted as a conceit that birds in certain contexts carried messages from the heavens to the earth. The author of this text seems to have regarded them as the form which the otherworld beings take in their relationship with Conaire. It is they who impose the prohibitions on him which limit his activities as king. Significantly, the text states, after he had broken some of the prohibitions, that ‘he was on this account the king whom the spectres banished’. The word used for spectres here, siabrai, is used in another text on his accession, viz. ‘that was the Conaire whom spectres brought to the kingship’. The parallelism between the two phrases is striking, and expresses the notion that just as a king was appointed by the spiritual powers he was also deposed by them.

The coming of Conaire to Tara is told as the adventure of an ancient hero, but the story-line is based on rituals concerning the installation of a king. It is likely that the basic idea was that the sun - symbolised as the bird-father - appointed the king to rule as its ritual son. Accordingly, the prohibitions, which are placed on Conaire and which he dramatically breaks, are echoes of ideas centering on the sacred rules which kept the community in equilibrium with the natural and cosmic realms. The fire within the king’s household would be a symbol of the king’s own reign, and it should not be seen to contend with the heat of the sun just as the reigning king should accept the ultimate mastery of the heavenly body. Finally, the hostel in which he meets his death belongs to Da Derg, which name can be translated as ‘the Red God’, suitable as a designation of the sun as god of the underworld. The ’son’ of the sun was destined to be favoured only for a while.

The Leinstermen at Tara:

It has been suggested that in the prehistoric background lies a memory of how the Leinstermen first took Tara from the Érainn. All indications are that the Laigin (’Leinstermen’) had possession of Tara some centuries before the Christian period. Their legends told of the mythical king Labhraidh, whose name literally meant ‘he speaks’ and may reflect the duty of a sacred king to make solemn pronouncements. He was sometimes referred to as Labhraidh Lorc (the epithet here meaning ‘fierce’). The actual establishment of their kingship, which by implication in the Conaire story is connected with the taking of Tara, seems to have been a matter of great ritual importance to the Leinstermen. According to tradition, Conaire was slain in a hostel by besiegers who had Leinster associations.

Another regnal story, which survives in a verse fragment from the 6th century AD, tells of a parallel victory gained by the Leinstermen in a siege. The location of this action is at Dind Ríg (at the moat of Burgage, south of Leighlinbridge in Co Carlow) and the Leinster leader was Labhraidh himself. The later literature amplifies the description. We read that Loeghaire Lorc was king of Tara, but that he was assassinated by his jealous brother Cobhthach Coel. The latter also poisoned Loeghaire’s son Ailill, and then usurped the kingship. Ailill had a young son who never spoke and was therefore known as Moen (’the dumb’). While playing hurley one day he was struck on the shin and cried out in pain. The other players remarked in astonishment that ‘the dumb speaks’ (labhraidh Moen), and this as a result became the name of the youth. Later, Cobhthach asked his poets who was the most generous man in Ireland, expecting that they would give the honour to him, but they replied ‘Labhraidh Moen’. Overcome with jealousy, the usurper then banished Labhraidh from the country. The young man was very successful abroad, however, and brought an army back to Ireland with him and laid siege to Cobhthach at the strong fortress of Dind Ríg. The fortress was set on fire, and all within perished. Thus was the kingship gained by Labhraidh.

This burning is likely to be an echo from some ritual. In the mediaeval literature, the mythical warrior Fionn mac Cumhaill, comes as a young stranger to Tara and saves the citadel from the fire-breathing spirit Aillén. Fionn (earlier, Find) was very much a product of Leinster tradition, and his alter-ego Find File was represented as an ancient Leinster king. It would be logical to consider brightness and wisdom - as indicated by the name Find - to be traits proper to a king, and the Leinstermen may therefore have dramatised the gaining and loss of kingship by a fire ritual. Fire, like Labhraidh, was both startling and fierce. Apart from this portrayal of a basic or original king-type, the Leinstermen laid particular stress on another reputed king of theirs, called Cathaoir Mór, whose reign the pseudo-historians put down variously to the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th centuries AD. The name Cathaoir Mór meant ‘great battle-lord’ and may in fact have been a title borne by Leinster kings at Tara for, as we have seen, the sovereignty there was a matter of acute contention.

The Connachta kingship:

Around the year 400 AD, the whole plain of Meath was taken from the Leinstermen by an ascendant sept called Connachta. In taking possession of Tara, these new rulers also took over the cult of the place. One obscure figure whom the Connachta used in their propaganda was Cormac. From the frequent occurrences of variants of this name in early Leinster genealogies, it would appear that the lore of Cormac was borrowed by the Connachta from their predecessors at Tara. By the 6th or 7th century AD a special legend had been developed by the Connachta concerning this character, whom they called Cormac mac Airt. Most of the motifs in the legend of Cormac have the marks of borrowing from Christian and Latin sources, but there are a few aspects which reflect earlier native ideology. Principal among those are the imagery of the ‘true’ king who gives wise judgements.

According to the epical biography, on the night before battle, king Art slept with the daughter of the druid Olc Aiche. Her name was Achtan and, before he left, Art gave her as tokens his sword and a golden ring. He was slain in the battle next day, and his foe Lughaidh mac Con took the kingship. Achtan gave birth to her baby, Cormac, but she had to endure several trials, as the usurper’s forces were continually trying to take and kill her child. On reaching the age of thirty, his druid-grandfather told Cormac that a certain day was auspicious for an attempt at gaining the kingship. Taking the sword and ring of his father Art, he set out for Tara all alone. As he approached the citadel, he met with a woman who was crying because the king had declared her sheep forfeit for grazing in the queen’s field of woad. ‘One shearing for another would have been more just!’ said Cormac. When word of this was brought to Lughaidh, the usurper recognised the truth of the judgement. He suspected that this was a son of Art and realised that his own false reign was at an end. Therefore, when Cormac came, Lughaidh received him and handed over the kingship to him.

The great king of the historical Connachta in the early 5th century AD was Niall Naoi-Ghiallach (’Niall of the Nine Hostages’), whose epithet referred to the sureties taken by him from other groups for his overlordship. Niall is described as the son of Eochu Muighmheadhon (the sobriquet here meaning ‘lord of slaves’) and a captive girl from Britain called Caireann. This may reflect historical fact. We read that Caireann was resented by Eochu’s legal wife, who gave her servile tasks to perform, and that Niall was therefore born in the open air. Birds attacked the baby, but the poet Torna took up the child, named it ‘Niall’ and prophesied its future greatness. Niall was reared by the poet, and when he was of age Torna brought him to Tara. A druid-smith was appointed to compare Niall with Eochu’s four legal sons, and he did this by setting fire to a forge where the young men were working. Each of them saved an implement from the fire, but the anvil was saved by Niall who thereby showed his superiority. Then follows a most striking vignette of the goddess of sovereignty. The five young men went hunting, and in the wilderness one of them went to fetch water. Coming to a well, he found an extremely ugly hag there guarding it. She asked him for a kiss, but he refused. His three brothers similarly refused, and as a result they got no water. Finally, Niall came to the well:

‘Water to me, woman!’ said Niall. ‘I will give it,’ she said, ‘and give me a kiss!’ ‘I will lie with you as well as giving a kiss!’ He threw himself on her then and gave her a kiss. Then, when he looked on her after that, there was not in the world a maiden with a more pleasant deportment or mien than her… ‘You are multishaped, woman,’ said the youth. ‘That is true,’ said the woman. ‘Who are you?’ said the youth. ‘I am sovereignty,’ she said, and spoke thus: ‘O king of Tara, I am the sovereignty; I will tell you its great value!’

She then explained to him that ‘just as you saw me loathsome, beastly, and horrible at first and beautiful at last, so is the sovereignty, for seldom is it gained without battles and conflicts, but at last a person finds it beautiful and comely’. This account makes use of a common folktale plot concerning a magical transforming kiss, but the plot is used to illustrate the dual nature of kingship, which must have been a very old concept. The Tara goddess of sovereignty, called Meadhbh, was described as being ‘half-red’ by nature, and the very name of this goddess (Celtic Meduva) refers to the ritual drink proffered to the new king. The word used for such an inauguration was feis (literally ’spending of the night’), with the import that the new king had sexual intercourse with the goddess. All of the main themes of the Tara inauguration rituals are therefore featured in this account of Niall.

The Coming of St. Patrick:

The last great portrayal of a stranger coming to Tara concerned the national saint. The historical Patrick must have been a very courageous and determined man, but he appears also to have been very shrewd in his dealings with the Irish, and to have made himself acutely sensitive to the structures of power which existed in the country. Concerning the difficulties which he encountered, and of the strategies adopted by him, the following remarks of his are the nearest hints which he gives to the actual situation: ‘And all that time I used to give presents to the kings, in addition to paying wages to their sons who travel with me’. This is not quite the same as the legendary accounts of the saint given by later writers and storytellers. One thing, however, which reflects reality is the emphasis placed by tradition on Patrick’s opposition to sun-worship, of which he certainly disapproved, as is clear from the following discourse in his Confessio:

For that sun, which we see, rises daily at God’s command for our sake; but it will never reign, nor will its splendour abide…

Patrick’s contemporaries noted his insistence on the contrast between ordinary physical light and the light of heaven. So much so, indeed, that traditions developed which used such imagery to show his triumph over Irish paganism. Borrowing from the Confessio, one early biographer, Muirchú, describes Patrick’s youth, captivity, and escape, and then goes on to tell in very dramatic terms of the saint’s mission to Christianise the country. We read that the druids of the high-king Laoghaire, son of Niall, had foretold in verse the coming of such a one, an ‘adze-head’ who would triumph over the old ways. Accordingly, Patrick arrived at Inbhear Dé (Arklow), but then sailed northwards and did not come to the midlands for quite some time.

Finally, he approached the sacred centre of pre-Christian Ireland. It was Easter-tide, and the custom was for the high-king to light a fire at Tara at that time. Anybody who lit a fire before Laoghaire did so would forfeit his life. Patrick, however, lit his own Easter fire at Sláine (Slane, Co Meath), and when Laoghaire saw this he rushed in anger, accompanied by his druids and soldiers, to confront the newcomer. Patrick was ordered to explain his behaviour, and he immediately got into contention with the druids - one of whom, named Lochru, he caused to be raised into the air and to fall and dash his brains against a stone. Seeing this, Laoghaire and his men tried to seize the saint, but darkness fell and the ground shook, causing them to mistake each other for him. Following this. Laoghaire pretended to do reverence to Patrick and invited him to come to Tara. Patrick however, suspected treachery. He blessed his eight companions, and they disappeared into the wilderness in the form of deer.

On the following day, the saint with five of his companions entered Tara through closed doors as the royal household was feasting. He was invited to join in the feast, and a druid called Lucat Moel put a drop of poison into his drink. Patrick blessed the drink, which then froze, and the drop fell out. A contest in wondrous feats between the saint and Lucat ensued. To show his power, the druid covered the plain with snow, but he could not remove it and Patrick had to do that for him. Similarly with a fog which the druid brought. Finally they agreed to a test of fire. A house was built, half of green wood and half of dry wood. Lucat went into the green part, wearing the saint’s chasuble, and Patrick’s servant-boy Benignus went into the other part, wearing the druid’s garb. The house was then set on fire, with the result that Lucat was burned to death while Benignus emerged unscathed. However, the druid’s garment on Benignus was consumed, whereas Patrick’s chasuble on Lucat was untouched. We are told (inaccurately) that Laoghaire was then converted, but Patrick told him that - on account of his previous opposition - none of his descendants would be kings.
This whole account is lavishly ornamented with detail from the Bible. The high-king and his cohorts are expressly compared with the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar and his satraps, and the author further admits that his description of the fire-ordeal has been influenced by the Book of Daniel. Also in the author’s mind was the contest of Moses with the magi of the Egyptian Pharaoh in Exodus, as well as that of Elias with the priests of Baal in the Book of Kings. The reference to green and dry wood echoes a passage in Luke’s Gospel.

Such tradition portrays the druids in an impersonal and ideological way. One early biographer, for instance, had been shown a stone at Tara onto which Lochlethanu was dashed after being miraculously lifted into the air by Parick’s prayer. Another biographer tells this of Lochru, and cannot hide his suspicion that the episode was borrowed from the Acts of Peter, an apocryphal text which has St. Peter overcoming the magician Simon Magus. It is clear that, already by the 7th century, there was an established tradition that Patrick had visited Tara. It is quite conceivable that he did indeed do so, but how he fared there in reality is a fact lost to history.

The idea that Tara was a source of renewal was not, however, entirely lost, nor with it was the dramatic picture of a victorious newcomer. During the Nine Years War towards the end of the 16th century, for instance, Aodh Ó Néill, Earl of Dungannon, made a push towards the Pale, and the following was reported of that to Dublin Castle:

Presently, he gathers all his forces and friends of Ulster, besides some out of Connacht, and with these makes incursions into the English Pale, even to the county of Meath - coming to the hill of Tara, where the old doating prophesy was that if O’Neill could come and shoe his horse, he should be king of all Ireland.

Dáithí Ó hÓgáin is the Associate Professor of Folklore at Univercity College Dublin, Ireland. He has been published extensively with many publications on the subject of Irish Myth and Folklore.